What is Material Design?

Material Design vs. Bootstrap

Let's say you are designing a dynamic website or web application. Making the components you use with a powerful front-end framework can help you finish your work weeks or months earlier. In fact, we can call these templates written with known codes in the coding world. Thus, the designer designs the user interface more simply.

Material Design

In June 2014, Google launched a new visual language called material design that "blends the classic principles of good design with the possibilities and innovations of science and technology". After a year, many frameworks emerged after deciding to open this design language to all developers. (E.g. Materialize, MUI, Material-UI)

Initially called Twitter Blueprint, Bootstrap was developed by Twitter developers to make interface components consistent. Bootstrap currently sees itself as "the most popular HTML, CSS and JS Framework for developing responsive design and mobile design projects on the web". In recent years, it has been clearly ahead in framework selection. But material design, especially if we add different developers, is definitely challenging Bootstrap's dominance.

Material Design vs. Bootstrap Design Comparison

After examining the basic differences and different features between Material Design and Bootstrap, let's leave the decision to you.

Philosophy

Bootstrap was initially made by Twitter to simplify the creation of responsive design websites. It offers many components and customizations to be able to make web applications. Material Design has been presented by Google to spread its concept to the web world. It is based on basic design. It does not give more. The rest is up to the designer.

Developer Experience

Bootstrap has a detailed documentation library. Since there is a wide sampling while designing, a faster result is obtained. Material Design is built on the BEM (Block, Element, Modifier) ​​methodology. Components are composed of a combination of more than one class. This approach provides extensive control but can cause HTML to be cumbersome.

Components

Bootstrap can come together in an order in terms of style and shape with HTML elements. It can provide a lot of additional components for each type of design.

Material Design provides fewer components than Bootstrap. However, since it is focused on creating all-material design applications, it comes with beautiful animations and styles.

Layout

Bootstrap has an advanced grid system with column rearrangement, hiding, etc. Material Design has a more primitive grid system. It does not support advanced features.

Design

Bootstrap offers more familiar and slightly above average default designs. However, it has great themes to choose from. Material Design includes innovative looks, bold colors, and great animations. It allows you to customize the appearance of your web application with the main and accent color options it offers.

Community

Bootstrap has a huge community with blog posts, plugins, and themes, thanks to its long-standing advantage. Since Material Design has so many alternative framework developers, it has a tight community, although not nearly as strong.

Copyright © 2024. Grifa Digital Solutions